Capella 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles  Applying Ethical Principles Ethical principles are regulations and guidelines that healthcare providers adopt to ensure patients’ safety and integrity

Capella 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

. The necessity of finding an equilibrium between ethical standards and patient care can cause ethical quandaries for healthcare professionals (Evans et al., 2020). Ethical principles assist doctors and nurses in overcoming difficult situations, combining the pursuit of healthcare improvements with core values such as beneficence, justice, and autonomy (Akdeniz et al., 2021). Ethical issues arise because of disputes between ethical principles such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fairness (Evans et al., 2020). The assessment intends to highlight the crucial role of ethical principles in directing medical personnel to cope with ethical difficulties. Summary of Case Study The case study of Dr. Leonard Harper, a geneticist at Hillside Medical Center, and Mrs. Clara Bennett, a pregnant lady worried about hereditary diseases, highlights important ethical considerations about embryonic genetic examinations. The underlying ethical quandary is between patient autonomy and the need for open communication with medical professionals. However, Mrs. Clara Bennett makes her autonomy by requesting that Dr. Leonard Harper withhold the frustrating results of her infant’s suspected  Down Syndrome from her husband. Dr. Harper faces a challenge in balancing patients’ wishes with the importance of open communication within a family. The case study underscores patient autonomy, privacy, and ethical decision-making in medical care (Capella University, n.d). Analysis of Case Study Peer-reviewed research on geneticists’ unique need for customer autonomy and open communication in decision-making shed a spotlight on Dr. Leonard Harper’s ethical dilemma with Mrs. Clara Bennett. Warton et al. (2023), underlined the importance of patient autonomy in making informed decisions, particularly regarding prenatal genetic testing. Respecting and understanding patients’ desires and preferences is critical, supporting them in making decisions about healthcare issues and building a collaborative relationship among patients and clinicians (Warton et al., 2023). This applies to Dr. Leonard Harper’s position, where Mrs. Clara Bennett wants to keep the genetic results of her fetus secret from her husband. Dr. Leonard Harper faces a dilemma about open communication and autonomy within the patient’s family. Dr. Leonard Harper is concerned about the strain this confidentiality can put on Mrs. Clara Bennett’s relationship and its implications for future medical decisions concerning the child’s health. Mattei et al. (2021), present a research study that investigates open communication among family members about ethical decision-making procedures in the context of prenatal genetic testing. Open communication between family members promotes mutual comprehension and facilitates collaborative decision-making regarding the genetic testing of prenatal children (Mattei et al., 2021). Capella 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles Mrs. Clara Bennett’s decision to keep information from her stressed husband complicates the dilemma, requiring ethical considerations of beneficence, open communication, and family consensus in decision-making. The research emphasizes the significance of open communication in soldiers’ families, highlighting that these circumstances significantly impact interpersonal interactions and decision-making (Kaye, 2023). Furthermore, it ensures that every participant is included in decision-making, establishing confidence and shared accountability and resulting in productive, beneficial decisions for the prenatal child. The rationale for selecting these studies is they meet the CRAAP criteria (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose), used to find the credibility and accuracy of resources (Muis et al., 2022). Articles emphasize patient autonomy, open communication, and trust in genetic healthcare decision-making. They highlight the ethical importance of respecting individuals’ rights and building trust between patients and providers. Effectiveness of Communication Approaches The efficacy of communication strategies is critical in the moral dilemma addressed in the case study. Dr. Leonard Harper effectively communicates prenatal findings to Mrs. Clara Bennett privately, demonstrating competence and compassion and ensuring a respectful and effective discussion (Vanstone et al., 2019). Autonomy and confidentiality are medical ethics that promote patient confidence and foster relationships between patients and clinicians (Nishioka et al., 2019). Dr. Leonard Harper’s anonymity and sympathetic approach to Mrs. Clara Bennett are vital to efficient interaction. His ability to create a secure environment for Mrs. Clara Bennett to express her conc